4/2/2023 0 Comments Software pulsa milanocSBP values recorded with OMRON device were 16 mmHg higher (SD of difference = 13 mmHg) cSBP (Sphy) and pSBP2 (Omr) values showed a significant correlation (r= 0.74 r 2=0.55, P <0.001) ( Figure 1) mean difference was of −0.8, SD = 13 mmHg.Ĭonclusion: When compared both devices they offer discordant results, and this discrepancy tends to be larger at higher BP levels. Results: cSBP measured with both devices values showed a significant correlation,r= 0.76 r 2=0.58. Pearson’s correlations and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between methods. Statistical software version 9.0 was used. Radial artery waveform recording at the left wrist was performed, patients with arrhythmias, severe hypertension, absence of radial pulse, diabetes were excluded. Methods: Eighty-four hypertensive subjects, mean age 58 ± 12 years were examined. Several studies have already pointed out the prognostic importance of central Systolic Blood Pressure (cSBP)Īim: To compare two devices that use indirect methods to asses central blood pressure: The SphygmoCor and OMROM HEM-9000AI.Īge ≥18 years, Males and females, Arterial Hypertension Introduction: The prognostic value of arterial stiffness has been shown in different groups of patients and also in apparently healthy populations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |